There also seems to be a faction of Dr. Bob followers who think the Traditions were unnecessary, as he did. We have an AA group here in St. Pete Beach "The No Fluff Group" lol, that reads "The definition of an Alcoholic" at the beginning of every meeting without any preface, as though it was some current "approved" literature. This little jewel came from the "Akron Pamphlets" that were commissioned (written by non-alcoholics) by Dr. Bob in 1944?
-- Edited by StPeteDean on Friday 3rd of February 2012 04:20:33 PM
Now whether you think I am right or wrong on this I really don't care, but I believe that the writings in that book were divinely inspired. It works and it works well. It doesn't just keep us sober but it makes us better - Amazing Grace, and all that. I don't think anybody has the right to add, subtract or otherwise tamper with the original message.
just from idle curiosity have you read this new chapter yet or are you basing your opinion on...ummm.....what are you basing your opinion on?
Personally I could care less one way or another, I still use third editions, that's how calcified I am, but I do so get amused when these storms blow through AA every ten years or so, as was previously mentioned the Big Book -has- already gone through changes, they add mew forwards every time a new edition comes out, what is your resistance to adding something following the 164 pages in the 5th edition?
Herbert Spencer said something about this that actually wasn't added until the later editions, when the appendix was added about Spiritual awakenings
I love AA's little tempests in teapots they always seem to have ongoing, hell it's been "the end of AA as we know it" since the 50's, we surely love our controversies
edit: I went and skimmed it fairly quickly, I think a bit of editing is in order but it looks like fundamentally sound stuff from a quick glimpse, I don't really have the patience right now to read the whole thing, but on the whole what I saw looked pretty good, and probably needs to be said.
The Big Book is incredible, it's fantastic, it's wonderful, it's divinely inspired, that being said there are holes in it big enough to drive a truck through, the 12 and 12 addressed many of those, but there are still more, but then I think Sobriety has a lot to do with how we navigate complex emotional interactions and fit in into the world around us, our families, our jobs, etc. I see too many AAers claim "Sobriety" and neglect their families and have -zero- emotional maturity, so much so that many, if not most old timers (that I know) end up having to go outside the Program to learn these things.
I think these things should be addressed in the BB, and I am a BB thumper of the worst sort.
-- Edited by LinBabaAgo-go on Friday 3rd of February 2012 11:13:15 PM
__________________
Light a man a fire and he's warm for a night, set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life
Good luck with that, considering that there is a large segment of the AA population that believes that the "first 164 pages" should be the only "approved literature" and would like to have the 12 & 12 removed from that list.
Dean, thanks for the replies. It's exciting to think that someone out there is actually reading the proposed "Twelfth Chapter." A little while ago I wrote an essay/article about this. I'm posting it here for all to see. Let me know what you think.
Now whether you think I am right or wrong on this I really don't care, but I believe that the writings in that book were divinely inspired. It works and it works well. It doesn't just keep us sober but it makes us better - Amazing Grace, and all that. I don't think anybody has the right to add, subtract or otherwise tamper with the original message.
just from idle curiosity have you read this new chapter yet or are you basing your opinion on...ummm.....what are you basing your opinion on?
Read it and it's OK, I guess. I'm basing it on both the KISS system and the 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it' line of thought, but mostly gut feel. That book saved my life. I don't need to be rational when it comes to my thoughts on this.
As I said: as a stand alone it's fine, but I really don't like the idea of messing with something that works. There is plenty of other works out there that could slot straight into the BB (a hell of a lot from 'The Meditations' by Marcus Aurelius for example, or some of the taoist thoughts) but I wouldn't put them their either. I'd recommend them as further readings but never to be given the same weight as the BB has for us.
-- Edited by Twelve Chapters on Friday 3rd of February 2012 04:13:33 PM
Isn't parenthood covered by 'The Family Afterward'? OK so Bill and lois weren't blessed / cursed with children - why do we need a new chapter on how to be a sober dad, when it's covered anyway?
__________________
It's not having what you want, it's wanting what you got. BB
I get the point you are driving at. I agree that we should not cut ourselves off from the new information and much agreed upon "best practices" involving family/child relations we have learned since 1939. That said, I don't think there has been a difficult situation since I have been sober where the appropriate course of action to take was not somewhere in the Big Book.
I personally don't think you are marketing the case in a way that will get the topic in the Big Book. Best shot would be to get a appendix section, and /or write a separate pamplet or book.
I didn't have kids either, but it always seems to be a positive thing when a member brings his kids/family members to some events and meetings so they have a understanding of the program.
__________________
Rob
"There ain't no Coupe DeVille hiding in the bottom of a Cracker Jack Box."