Alcoholics Anonymous
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Will AA sustain itself?


MIP Old Timer

Status: Offline
Posts: 1503
Date:
Will AA sustain itself?
Permalink  
 


Why is AA dying slowly? I have wondered about this in recent years. Many who were on fire for the fellowship have now burnt out. Many who vowed to serve until they die are not even vaguely interested in even attending meetings.
For myself I had found very early in my recovery, that if I relied on own power alone to sustain my life in AA I would surely die. I discovered this very early about myself and my personality. I always started of with a bang and fizzled out pretty early and became bored. I needed something bigger than myself to keep me here for life.
I found the answer in the AA book pg 64. "Resentment is the "number one offender. It destroys more alcoholics than anything else."
I found that my daily spiritual walk in the 12 step recovery program was what will keep me sustained forever. The great thing now is that I have a host of new friends in the newcomers who come to AA. As long there is alcohol around there will always be a fresh supply of newcomers. I enjoy it.


__________________
But for the grace of God.


MIP Old Timer

Status: Offline
Posts: 805
Date:
Permalink  
 

We know the answer Gonee

it isn't AA any more, it's something else, it's "Middle of the road" "half measures" "don't drink and go to meetings" and not "with all of the earnestness at our command we beg of you to be fearless and thorough from the very start", AA has fragmented into 2 camps, "Don't drink and go to meetings" and "No human power could relieve our alcoholism" the "meeting makers make it" crowd and the "If you have decided you want what we have and are willing to go to any length to get it then you are ready to take certain steps, Half measures availed us nothing. We stood at the turning point. we asked His protection and care with complete abandon." crowd

I am firmly in the middle although it doesn't appear that way on this site, I think 90 in 90 AND following the directions out of the book is effective, but the newcomer gets so many conflicting messages he doesn't know -who- to believe, so he believes the loudest voice, the voice repeated the most often, "don't drink and go to meetings" and tries the "easier softer way" and when it doesn't work, says to himself and others "AA doesn't work" when in fact if he hasn't taken the steps, he's never tried AA, just gone to some meetings

"How it works" is read at the beginning of every meeting yet it appears many don't even listen to what that says, that the steps are the "suggested program of recovery" for those that are "ready to go to any lengths"

I think with the advent of Treatment centers and court ordered alcoholics, non alcoholics, drug addicts, DUI offenders, heavy drinkers, and the hundreds of thousands of alcoholics sent to AA by everyone under the sun including therapists surpassed our ability to pass on what "the message" of AA really is, that changes started occuring so slowly we didn't see them until it was too late, and AA changed from a "solution based" program to a "group therapy" program, until now it is firmly entrenched in the AA culture

It used to be "rarely have we seen a person fail that thoroughly followed our path" now that path has changed, and it's "rarely have we seen a person succeed" that followed that new path of "don't drink and go to meetings" and as our program has changed our success rate has been dropping and dropping, until now, our numbers are the worst they have ever been, we keep less then 5% of the people who walk through the doors according to some studies, -which is the same rate alcoholics get sober without AA-

Gone is the idea that one has to "participate in their own recovery" that action is the key word, Dr Bob jelled the entire program down to 2 words, "Love and Service", that has changed to "group hug" and "How was your day", gone is the idea that selfishness, self centeredness is the root of the alcoholics problem, and newcomers are even encouraged to talk about themselves and their day at group level!!!!

Service and helping others as a foundation of recovery has disappeared, those that do so are called "the service people" by those who just attend meetings and talk about their day, gone is the idea that 12 step calls are important, that reaching behind us to pull the newer people up is the very foundation of sobriety, Love is an action word, and in AA I feel love should equal "service" or helping others, which is the antidote for selfishness, not "whining about my day" but "helping others"

Gone is the idea that the steps are the key, even though it is read at the beginning of every meeting, then newcomers are encouraged to "take it easy" and not work the steps too fast, to "wait a year" before working the steps

Gone is the idea that a groups primary purpose is to carry it's message to the still suffering alcoholic in favor of listening to the still suffering alcoholic talk about their day, and their problems, meetings used to be focused on "The Solution" now many are just focused on "The Problem", we have Treatment Center Graduates passing along Treatment Center Jargon and "tips and Tricks" like "Triggers" and calling it AA, when in fact it is the exact opposite of what AA is

Gone is the idea that a newcomer had to work the steps and get some time before he was considered able to offer anything to the meeting, that carrying the actual solution to alcoholism was a groups primary purpose, as opposed to listening to people with NO clue what the solution to alcoholism talk about "their day" to a room full of people who also don't know what the solution is, so they learn that SHARING YOUR PROBLEM is the solution, not sharing the solution, the problem is, you can't pass along what you don't have.

Gone is the idea that working with others is integral to ones own sobriety, gone are the people who read Chapter 7 and know what it says, much less the rest of the book

I see people who have been attending meetings for varying lengths of time who have never worked the steps, who have no working knowledge of the Traditions, who have never sponsored others, who have no familiarity with what The Big Book actually says espousing their personal views and calling it "AA" when in fact it is in DIRECT CONTRADICTION with what our program of action really says, they spout this nonsense and say it is AA, no wonder the newcomer is confused

When A.A. was very successful, the folks who did the talking in meetings

were recovered alcoholics. The suffering and untreated alcoholics listened.

After hearing what it takes to recover, the newcomer was faced with a

decision; "Are you going to take the Steps and recover or are you going to

get back out there and finish the job?" If they said they "were willing to

go to any length", they were given a sponsor, a Big Book and began the

process of recovery by taking the Steps and experiencing the Promises

that result from that course of action. This process kept the newcomer

involved in working with others and continued the growth of our Fellowship.

If it aint in the first 164 pages or the 12 x 12, it aint AA, pure and simple, some go so far as to exclude the 12 x 12, that is a personal preference I have no opinion on for others, I always liked the 12 x 12 and think it is a great supplement to the Big Book

With so very few finding lasting sobriety and the continued demise of AA

groups, it is obvious that we have not remained willing to admit our faults

and to correct them promptly. Seems to me that the Delegate of the

Northeast Ohio Area, Bob Bacon, identified our mistakes and our faults when

he talked to a group of AA's in 1976. He said, in essence, we are no longer

showing the newcomer that we have a solution for alcoholism. We are not

telling them about the Big Book and how very important that Book is to our

long-term sobriety. We are not telling them about our Traditions and how

very important they are to the individual groups and to Alcoholics

Anonymous as a whole. 


Rather, we are using our meeting time for drunkalogs,

a discussion of our problems, ideas and opinions or "my day" or "my way".

Having been around for a few years, and reflecting on what Bob Bacon had

to say, it would appear that we have permitted newcomers to convince the

old-timers that they have a better idea. They had just spent 30 or more

days in a treatment facility where they had been impressed with the need to

talk about their problems in Group Therapy Sessions. They had been told

that it didn't make any difference what their real problem was; A.A. had

the "best program". They were told that they should go to an A.A. meeting

every day for the 1st 90 days out of treatment. They were told that they

shouldn't make any major decisions for the 1st year of their sobriety. And

what they were told goes on and on, most of which are contrary to the

Program of Alcoholics Anonymous!


Apparently, what they were told sounded

pretty good to the A.A. members who were here when the TC clients started

showing up at our meetings. And a lot of the A.A. members liked the idea of

the treatment centers because the centers provided a place where they could

drop off a serious drinker, if he/she had insurance. That eliminated some of the

inconveniences we had been plagued with before; having to pour orange

juice and honey or a shot of booze down a vibrating alky to help them

"detox".


Our growth rate was approximately 7% and the number of sober members of

Alcoholics Anonymous doubled every 10 years. With the advent of the rapid

growth of the Treatment Industry, the acceptance of our success with

alcoholics by the judicial system and endorsement of physicians,

psychiatrist, psychologist, etc. all kinds of people were pouring into A.A.

at a rate greater than we had ever dreamed possible.

Almost without realizing what was happening, our meetings began

changing from ones that focused on recovery from alcoholism to

"discussion or participation" types of meetings that invited everyone to

talk about whatever was on their mind. The meetings evolved from a program

of spiritual development to the group therapy type of meeting where we

heard more and more about "our problems" and less and less about the

Program of Recovery by the Big Book and the preservation of our Fellowship

by adhering to our Traditions.

What has been the result of all this? Well, never have we had so many

coming to us for help. But never have we had such a slow growth rate which

has now started to decline. For the first time in our history, Alcoholics

Anonymous is losing members faster than they are coming in and our success

rate is unbelievably low. Statistics from the Inter-Group Office of some

major cities indicate less than 5% of those expressing a desire to stop

drinking is successful for more than 5 years;


The change in the content of our meetings is proving to be misery-traps for the newcomer and

in turn, misery-traps for the groups that depend on the "discussion or

participation" type meetings.


Why is this? The answer is very simple. When meetings were opened so

that untreated alcoholics & non-alcoholics were given the opportunity to

express their ideas, their opinions, air their problems and tell how they

were told to do it where they came from, the confused newcomer became more

confused with the diversity of information that was being presented. More

and more they were encouraged to "just go to meetings and don't drink" or

worse yet, "go to 90 meetings in 90 days". The newcomer no longer was told

to take the Steps or get back out there and finish the job. In fact, they

are often told, "Don't rush into taking the Steps. Take your time." The

alcoholics who participated in the writing of the Big Book didn't wait.

They took the Steps in the first few days following their last drink.


There have always been a few groups that would not yield to the group

therapy trend. They stayed firm to their commitment to try to carry a

single message to the suffering alcoholic. That is to tell the newcomer "we

have had a spiritual awakening as the result of these Steps and if you want

to recover, we will see that you have a sponsor who has recovered and will

lead you along the path the 1st 100 laid down for us". Recovered

alcoholics have begun founding groups that have a single purpose and

inform the newcomer that until they have taken the steps and recovered,

they will not be permitted to say anything in meetings. They will listen to

recovered alcoholics, they will take the Steps, they will recover and then

they will try to pass their experience and knowledge on to the ones who are

seeking the kind of help we provide in Alcoholics Anonymous. As this

movement spreads, as it is beginning to, Alcoholics Anonymous will again be

very successful in doing the one thing God intended for us to do and that

is to help the suffering alcoholic recover, if he has decided he wants what

we have and is willing to go to any length to recover, to take and apply

our Twelve Steps to our lives and protect our Fellowship by honoring our

Twelve Traditions.


There is a tendency to want to place the blame for our predicament on

the treatment industry and professionals. They do what they do and it has

nothing to do with what we in Alcoholics Anonymous do. That is their

business. That is not where to place the blame and also is in violation of

our Tenth Tradition.


The real problem is that the members of Alcoholics Anonymous, who were

here when the "clients" began coming to our Fellowship did not help the

"clients" understand that our Program had been firmly established since

April 1939, and that the guidelines for the preservation and growth of our

Fellowship were adopted in 1950. That they must get rid of their new "old

ideas" and start practicing the Twelve Step Program of Alcoholics Anonymous

as it was given to us. That until they had taken the Steps and recovered,

they had nothing to say that needed to be heard except by their sponsor.


But that didn't happen. To the contrary, the old timers failed in their

responsibility to the newcomer to remind them of a vital truth, "Rarely

have we seen a person fail who has thoroughly followed our path. Those who

do not recover are people who cannot or will not completely give themselves

to this simple program." We have permitted untreated alcoholics and

non-alcoholics to sit in our meetings and

lay out their problems, ideas and opinions.


We have gone from, "Rarely

have we seen a person fail" to "Seldom do we see a person recover".

So there we are. We have had 30 years of unbelievable success by

following the directions in the Big Book. We have had 30 years of

disappointing failure by wanting to hear from everyone. We now have

something to compare.

We now know what the problem is and we know what the solution is.

Unfortunately, we have not been prompt to correct the faults and mistakes,

which have been created by what would appear to be large doses of apathy

and complacency. The problem we are trying to live with is needlessly

killing alcoholics.

The Solution? The Power, greater than ourselves, that we find through

our Twelve Steps promises recovery for those who are willing to follow the

clear-cut directions in the Big Book.


Do you want to be a part of the problem or a part of the solution?






-- Edited by LinBaba on Sunday 28th of November 2010 01:29:56 PM

__________________

 

it's not the change that's painful, it's the resistance to change that is painful



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 268
Date:
Permalink  
 

Well stated.

AKA: Slouching twards Washintonianism.

Abolition, anyone?

Solution? Real AA Small, won't have many takers, but worthwhile.
Looking for a new meeting myself.
Might have to start one.
After all I DO own a coffee pot.

__________________


MIP Old Timer

Status: Offline
Posts: 1642
Date:
Permalink  
 

I agree with lot of the things Lin has said. 

Given that almost all the meetings in my area are "open meetings",  we get the court ordered, spouse/family/Doctor/Therapist/Church ordered, AA curious ETC.  Occasionally they do work the program and get sober.

Given that we don't pre-screen and have very few qualifications for meeting attendance and membership,  I wouldn't expect our success percentages to ever be great,  but I have seen a lot of miracles over the years every drunk is a mutually exclusive individual,  not a statistic.

I have seen less young people at our meetings the past 15 years,  many chose to attend NA meetings as they typically abused both the drink and drugs.  NA membership has surged.

I live in the NW Atlanta Burbs and the number of AA groups members and sobriety has really soared in the 10 years I have lived here, we really have a lot of good meetings and sobriety, although we do have a lot of the issues Lin has mentioned.

The SR. group members:

1) need to be part of the solution when issues/poor meeting content arises.  Meeting formats and chairperson/discussion leader guidelines need to be revised.

2)  Talk the the new people, if they are serious,  help get them involved and get sponsor to help them work the steps. (Don't just hang out taking to your old buddies)

3) Start a group if necessary. I was so pissed after a meeting one night, I had to take action. If you can help start a well run and formatted meeting,  other groups in the area will take note and start to use ideas to help their group.

4) Getting resentful and not going to meetings is BS,  it is our responsibility to make sure the light is on for the new person,  as it was on when we arrived for help.








   



__________________

Rob

"There ain't no Coupe DeVille hiding in the bottom of a Cracker Jack Box."



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 490
Date:
Permalink  
 

gonee wrote:

Why is AA dying slowly?


When someone asks why something is happening, it implies that all are first in agreement that it IS happening.

I can't legitimately cast an opinion on this debate because I don't believe AA is "slowly dying".

Barisax


__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 403
Date:
Permalink  
 

Yeah, AA in my city certainly seems to be thriving.

In many areas of life, as people accumulate experience, they decry the fact that the world is changing around them and that things are not as good as they used to be.

I wonder if the thing that is really changing is THE OBSERVER. Having developed a pretty accurate internal meter of what works and doesn't work, I wonder if that makes the less useful practices stand out more in their minds and seem more important than they are.

Just speculation.

__________________
Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's, and unto God that which is God's.


MIP Old Timer

Status: Offline
Posts: 805
Date:
Permalink  
 

barisax wrote:

 

gonee wrote:

Why is AA dying slowly?


When someone asks why something is happening, it implies that all are first in agreement that it IS happening.

I can't legitimately cast an opinion on this debate because I don't believe AA is "slowly dying".

Barisax

 





zzworldontheweb wrote:


Yeah, AA in my city certainly seems to be thriving.

In many areas of life, as people accumulate experience, they decry the fact that the world is changing around them and that things are not as good as they used to be.

I wonder if the thing that is really changing is THE OBSERVER. Having developed a pretty accurate internal meter of what works and doesn't work, I wonder if that makes the less useful practices stand out more in their minds and seem more important than they are.

Just speculation.




Our growth rate has stalled and it's said for the first time in our history we are losing numbers, as opposed to the past we grew exponentially

1935-9 40-100 members
1950 "far above 150,000 members" 6000 groups
March 1976 "far above 1,000,000 members" 28,000 groups
Jan 1 2000  2,160,013 members 108,000 groups

Jan 1 2005    2,082,980 members 105,294 groups
Jan 1, 2010
2,103,033 members 115,773 Groups
Jan 2005 Members in U.S. 1,190,637
Jan 2010 Members in U.S    1,264,716

That is what Old Timers are talking about AA has stopped growing in the exponential way it once was, as of jan 2010 we have less members then we did in Jan 2000, we are actually "losing" members, as opposed to growing exponentially as we did in the past


From 1939 to 1950 we grew from 40 to 150,000, I don't even know how to do the math on that exponential growth rate

from 1950 to 1975 we grew 675% + or -, from 150k to >1 million

from 1975 to 2000 we doubled in size, from 1 million to 2 million

from 2000 to 2010 we shrank

These are AA's own numbers I use, this is not some "perception" by the deluded "old timers" that are remembering the fictional "good old days" these are hard numbers

What has changed?

1939-1950 AA was Hardcore
1950-1975 AA was hardcore
1975-2000 we saw the advent of the trends I discussed in the my earlier post, but there was still a lot of hardcore AA, but it was changing into something different, it was already being felt in 1975
2000-2010 we are seeing the results of the "easier softer way" of "don't drink and go to meetings" and "talk about your problems" rather then work the steps and "talk about the solution"

The math speaks for itself

AA has stopped growing, because AA has stopped working, our so called "success rate" now is equal to that of alcoholics who just stop on their own, between 2.5% and 5%

in a Program that relies on Newcomers this is a very real and very disturbing trend, and a far cry from the results we got with the first 40, which are documented, or the early days of Cleveland, which were documented as well, Clarence wrote down everyone names and adress when they came in, they had a staggering 93% success rate, verifiable

don't drink and go to meetings is proving to be a dismal failure, whereas working the steps and then taking others through the steps has an amazing success rate, the numbers are all there, this isn't rocket science, the people who "don't drink and go to meetings' generally....drink, well they have a success rate of between 2.5% and 5%, and the people who work the steps and sponsor others have, at the very least a 50-75% chance to stay sober, and "Hardcore" AA "Cleveland Style" has a greater then 90% success rate

The numbers speak for themselves

That's Why AA is going to be OK, Gonee, there are enough of us around that have actually read that book and pass on what it says to do with alcoholics desperate enough to actually have the willingness to work on their own recovery, and not expect it to magically happen by bitching in meetings and listening to other people bitch, but actually putting pen to paper and getting off their ass and helping others

In Alcoholics Anonymous Comes of Age, Bill Wilson wrote:

The first Cleveland meeting started in June, 1939, at the home of Abby G. and his wife Grace. . . . But Abbys presently ran out of space. . . . These multiplying and bulging meetings continued to run short of home space, and they fanned out into small halls and church basements. . . . We old-timers in New York and Akron had regarded this fantastic phenomenon with deep misgivings. . . . Yet there in Cleveland we saw about twenty members, not very experienced themselves, suddenly confronted by hundreds of newcomers. . . . How could they possibly manage? We did not know. But a year later we did know; for by then Cleveland had about thirty groups and several hundred members. . . . Yes, Clevelands results were of the best. Their results were in fact so good, and A.A.s membership elsewhere so small, that many a Clevelander really thought A.A. had started there in the first place. . . . 

Documenting the extraordinary Cleveland results (a 93% success rate), A.A.s DR. BOB and the Good Oldtimers quoted Cleveland founder Clarence H. Snyder as follows:

They take it so casually today. I think a little discipline is necessary. I think A.A. was more effective in those days. Records in Cleveland show that 93 percent of those who came to us never had a drink again. When I discovered that people had slips in A.A., it really shook me up. Today, its all watered down so much. Anyone can wander in now.





-- Edited by LinBaba on Tuesday 30th of November 2010 01:25:23 AM

__________________

 

it's not the change that's painful, it's the resistance to change that is painful



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 268
Date:
Permalink  
 

Thank you Lin Baba.

Sorry folks, that's the hard truth. We're shrinking.

I just got back from a meeting that both scared me and gave me hope.

A couple of people that didn't "get it" for TWENTY years!

Somebody that couldn't say they have recovered because it had only been four months.....

They are "in recovery". Others that were fighting to stay sober.

Scary.

Page 84, paragraph 4: "And we have ceased fighting anything or anyone - even alcohol. For by this time sanity will have returned. We will seldom be interested in liquor. If tempted, we recoil from it as from a hot flame. We react sanely and normally, and we will find that this has happened automatically. We will see that our new attitude toward liquor has been given us without any thought or effort on our part. It just comes! That is the miracle of it. We are not fighting it, neither are we avoiding temptation. We feel as though we had been placed in a position of neutrality - safe and protected. We have not even sworn off. Instead, the problem has been removed. It does not exist for us."

Really. It just comes. The thing is, it comes from God. AA (the real program) is how to get the gift.
This other stuff just isn't working. A lot of people are making a lot of treatment center money, and their clients pay through the nose, and go back time after time after time...

And treatment center BS theory all has two major themes:

Encourage self centeredness.
Avoid God.

And now it has filled the rooms.
And the rooms are getting empty.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 146
Date:
Permalink  
 

I can only speak to my own experience (as a newcomer) and one who came through a hospital detox and in-patient rehab. 

Unfortunately, most I was with in re-hab were either court ordered  or there to "look good" to the courts due to pending legal action.  As a result, they were not necessarily ready -- they didn't reach their own bottom, as I did (I was voluntary).  A sure recipe for failure.

And a majority (well over half) were not there for the first time -- some as many as 8 or 10. 

Rainspa's statement about "a lot of treatment center money" is very true.   Many I was with, when there insurance ran out, received a "scholarship" which allowed them to stay.  Some didn't.  I suspect that there was some type of write-off for needy that didn't exist for those of means, but I don't know that for sure.

I'm not sure about teaching self-centeredness.  I didn't feel that for me, but did see it in some others.  I think it speaks more to the willingness of the patient, but it really doesn't matter for this discussion.

We went to meetings on a nightly basis, mostly speaker meetings.  I think what was lacking was the importance of finding a higher power AND working the steps.  And I see it in the meetings I attend now.  I hear it, but it is not stressed to the degree that I think it should be.  Go to meetings and get a sponsor seems to be the prevailing message.

For the first 3 months of my sobriety I didn't have a sponsor but did go to meetings 6-7 nights a week.  It helped keep me sober.  But until I got a sponsor and worked the steps in months 4-7, I was just not drinking.  Working the steps changed me, it really did.  I'm still making amends (amazing what 30 years of drinking does) but live as best I can in 10-12.  I felt the 'psychic change" the BB describes. I'm mostly at peace now and when I'm not I try to recognize it and change it.  "We are not fighting it, neither are we avoiding temptation" is true for me most of the time.  It's progress not perfection and that's fine with me.  As Rainspa said it just comes, but it came for me through a higher power and working the steps.

And I think hardcore AA isn't a bad thing .  To me it doesn't mean lacking compassion, it means teaching the program the right way, with compassion AND with a kick in the ass when each is needed.  That's worked for me so far, and hopefully will work today.


-- Edited by ferrisdp on Tuesday 30th of November 2010 08:15:29 AM

-- Edited by ferrisdp on Tuesday 30th of November 2010 08:20:16 AM

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 403
Date:
Permalink  
 

Hmmm.. going from 2.16 million to 2.1 million in ten years IS technically shrinking, yes, but that difference might be within the range of statistical error. It sounds like "not growing" is more accurate than "shrinking".

Could lack of growth not also result from reaching the saturation point? If there are 300 million people in the US, and 10% of them have a drinking problem, and only ten percent of THOSE people ever even ATTEMPT to quit, that would be 3 million.  If 2 million of them are in AA, that seems pretty good.

Changes in attitudes could indeed have impact also, agreed.  Just thinking out loud here.

I will also admit that it rankles me a bit when people talk in meetings about how the fellowship is the primary thing keeping them sober.  Human fellowship is a darn fragile thing and apt to collapse when things get tough.


-- Edited by zzworldontheweb on Tuesday 30th of November 2010 08:00:03 AM

__________________
Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's, and unto God that which is God's.


MIP Old Timer

Status: Offline
Posts: 805
Date:
Permalink  
 

The 2 million members is worldwide, not just the US, and I don't think we have reached "saturation", the US membership is just over 1.2 million at present

I'd have to check NA's membership numbers but Rob may have a point about many people going to NA over the last 10-20 years

I think what has happened is this

"I think the main thing that's going on right now is a tendency to confuse spirituality and therapy," such as that offered in chemical-dependency treatment centers, Kurtz said, and most addicts probably need both.

"AA is not therapy. AA is not religion," he said. Rather it offers "this amorphous thing" called spirituality, a quality "that when we see it in others, we want some of that." A truly spiritual Twelve Step program can be identified, he said, by these qualities: Humor and laughter characterize its meetings; its participants do not wallow in moans and hugs.

To differentiate between spirituality and therapy, Kurtz quotes former Czech leader Vaclav Havel: "People need understanding more than they want explanation." Therapy tends to explain the past, spirituality to promote understanding, he said, and spirituality encourages the addict to "embrace the present," whatever caused his or her problems.

Some recovering alcoholics reject AA's spirituality because they have been alienated by fledgling AA members who gush with enthusiasm about something they have found meaningful, said Kurtz. Yet other AA members, he said, "when they first came around, said they didn't have any use for spirituality," only to discover as they tried the program that it worked for them.

Kurtz said AA members included people who "seem to find their religion in it." Among these are people who have been wounded by institutional religion. But about half of AA members return to a religious affiliation they had previously experienced, he said, and they bring depth and maturity to their renewed participation.

 

Those paragraphs match my experience exactly, which is everyone I know that has come in, worked the steps and then sponsored others are still sober today, while those that came in and got hung up on steps 3 and 4 returned to alcohol, anywhere from chronic relapsing to a few friends that got 7-10 years of sobriety before they returned to drinking, and never returned

I really don't know, or can't explain why, but everyone I know who surrendered, worked the steps, sponsored others, and was prepared to go to any lengths are still sober today, in my first years a fellowship grew around me of people who "did the deal", maybe a few hundred of us, we were young (in our twenties) including some in their teens and a few in their thirties, those people are still sober today, probably 100-150 of the people I know on Facebook have between 15-25 years of sobriety, people who I have known since their first few meetings or people who were there for my first meetings, of the people who "did the deal" I can't think of any of them that returned to drinking, of the people that didn't work the steps, sponsor others, take commitments,  I can't think of any of them that are still sober, I am one of the about 10% that actually "relapsed" and came back, and truthfully that number is probably closer to 5%

So I don't know how much the correlation is between people that were willing to surrrender and do what they were told, and those who worked the steps, (the same group) I don't know how much of their success rate is because they were willing to surrender, and how much is because they worked the steps, but if I were to guess, the "success rate" of those people I know that did work the steps is well over 90%, and the failure rate of those who didn't work the steps is up well over 90%...those people just don't make it, a few make it a few years, some very very angry ones make it a few more, but then they disappear, I have a few of them as friends on Facebook, and they all still drink

__________________

 

it's not the change that's painful, it's the resistance to change that is painful



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 490
Date:
Permalink  
 

I don't think it's logical to expect AA to continue to grow exponentially.  I think much of the recent growth has been from the influx of people from treatment programs, court orders, employee assistance programs, etc.  As we know from experience, the majority of these referrals are less than fully voluntary, and they don't stick around.  OTOH, the number of cold walk-ins does seem to be in decline, but I can't put a finger on why.   I came in cold.  AA was my first attempt of any kind to deal with my drinking.  I was not court ordered, or referred by a doctor, employer, or even urged by family - in fact it came as a shock to my wife at the time that I admitted I had a drinking problem.  I got the feeling that even then, a lot more people were going through some kind of therapy or treatment program first, or concurrent with AA.  I contemplated it, but when I called AA the person who answered the phone was blunt.  "You can not drink and go to meetings, or you can go spend 10 grand for a 30 day treatment program and THEN not drink and go to meetings".

I want to emphasize, "don't drink and go to meetings" isn't the entire program.  I don't know anyone who presents it that way, or anyone who assumes it's that way really.  It was told to me early on, and I clearly understood that not drinking and going to meetings gave me a foothold preferable to staying home and drinking.  That if I was going to get it, I had to want it, and a way to find out that I wanted it was to hang around some people who had it.  In order to do that, I didn't drink and I went to meetings.

But the other thing I heard pretty quickly was, AA is not for those who need it it's for those who want it.  I have never had any results "selling" AA to someone who doesn't want to stop drinking.  In fact, in many of these encounters it seemed like it was the other person doing the selling... when somebody with a bottle in one hand and a phone in the other tells me AA doesn't work, there isn't really anything I can do except move on.  I love to argue and debate as much as anyone, maybe more than most, but I love AA too much to reduce it to a tit-for-tat, should and should not, and I especially do not want to see AA become a crusading entity for solving social problems.  AA works because it works on an individual level; one alcoholic to another.  I could go out on a limb and say that maybe no problem ever gets solved except on an individual level.  But suffice it to say, individuality is very important to me.  The still-suffering alcoholic is a person.  When I see the line in the Big Book, about what can I do for the man who is still suffering, that's what I see - a man who is suffering.  It doesn't say what can I do to cure the world of the giant blight of alcoholism/addiction/mental illness.

Therefore, I don't feel that obsession with numbers and statistics is productive.  As some have pointed out, the stats have a very high margin of error because AA does not (and should not) keep membership rosters, has no method of policing sobriety, and none of those things would contribute to our primary purpose.  My goal today is to stay sober today, practice step 10, 11, and 12, and be ready to be the hand of AA should anyone reach out.  My goal is not to get those numbers back up there in the double-digit growth rate, or for that matter, to win any on-line arguments, or to project some politically correct image of AA... or project an oldtimer hard-core image of AA.  I have to pretty much get down to basics - I didn't come to AA to save the world, or save my soul.... I came to save my ass.  I'm sure there are plenty of people who don't like me and don't want what I have.  The only thing I can tell them is to keep coming back, go to more meetings, and they'll find someone they can relate to.

One other thing I want to say, is that I don't believe there are two "factions" in AA or that it is split between hard-core Big Book oldtimers and new-age touchy-feely therapy types.  AA is made up of millions of individuals, a few of which may see themselves as one or the other extreme, or more likely see others as the opposite extreme, but everybody is somewhere in between, off to the side this way or that.  If they are sober and they are happy, they must be doing something that works for them.  What I watch out for are people who are clearly miserable self-loathing grumps that want to tell me I have to do it their way or else I'll end up drunk and dead.  That was how I pictured sobriety when I walked through the door, and the funny part is, I was - at that moment - utterly willing to become stupid, boring and glum in order to cheat my fate at alcoholic death.  Fortunately, the first people I met were the opposite of stupid, boring, or glum and they offered something I wanted and were totally willing to give it away.

Barisax

__________________


MIP Old Timer

Status: Offline
Posts: 805
Date:
Permalink  
 

barisax wrote:

What I watch out for are people who are clearly miserable self-loathing grumps that want to tell me I have to do it their way or else I'll end up drunk and dead.




Interesting this seems to be a recurring theme

People who say the steps ARE the Program = miserable self-loathing grumps

telling a newcomer that the 12 steps ARE the program = ass kicking

That going to a big book or step study and concentrating on The Solution = being told to shut up

Personally, as I have said before, I fall in the middle, although I am welcome in both the "hardcore meetings" and the "Touchy Feely" meetings, I do have friends in both camps, and attend meetings that reflect that, the "Trudgers" make fun of the people who "Talk about their feelings" and they in turn call the Hardcore contingent "AA Nazis"

The meetings I attend are "love based" but also "solution based", and the 2 x 4 is left at the door, it's strictly for the relationship between the sponsor and sponsee

As always when we reach this point in our conversation where you get specific and clear, I agree with most everything you say, not all, but most, and it's our differences that make us stronger IMO, but the biggest part in which I feel we differ is the reason it makes us stronger is it makes you be able to sponsor newcomers I am unable to reach, and vice versa, but if one doesn't sponsor, how is one adding to the solution, and not the problem? If one doesn't take newcomers through the steps, and teach them about our Traditions and how and why they are so important, how are we part of the solution and not the problem?

I think the biggest part of "The Problem" is newcomers aren't being told the steps are the solution, they aren't being taught The Traditions, they aren't being taught that AA is "Love and Service" which mean the same thing, they are being taught to share their problems at Group Level before they have a solution, and all this respponsibility falls squarely on the shoulders of apathetic old timers that can't be bothered to pass that message along. It's not the new people that are coming in that bear the responsibility of our dismal "success rates" now, that responsibility falls squarely on the shoulders of those that are already here, a responsibility that is being shirked because the old timers are too apathetic and too busy with their bright and shiny new lives, lives that AA gave them

I was taught if we don't pass it on, we don't get to keep it, and as Rainspa pointed out, the opposite is being taught now, self centered behavior such as newcomers blathering on in meetings about how they can't stay sober is encouraged, I was taught if one isn't sharing the solution at group level, one is only spreading the problem, and one can't share what one doesn't have, such as experience with the steps or the spiritual awakening as the result of the steps, which is the proper subject to be shared at a meeting of Alcoholics Anonymous

Talk without action is a hallucination, intentions without action is a fantasy, Talk without action are just empty words, this is a program of action, and without the action, this program is an empty promise that is slaughtering newcomers at an alarming rate, and yes I agree that this is best handled on an individual level, as in going to meetings and finding newcomers and taking them through the steps, teaching them about the Traditions, and showing them by example, as well as putting them to work that love is an action word, that unless they actually get off their own butts and help others, they are part of the problem, and not the solution

That is how I address what is happening in AA today, and for me, I am comfortable in knowing that is why AA will be OK, as long as we have that book that outlines that program of ACTION

So I just don't equate staying focused on The Solution is = to being a miserable, self loathing grump and focusing on the steps is = butt kicking and being mean to newcomers and I am sad that is the product being sold here as a counter to what I am saying, the product sold to me was work the steps and I will be happy, joyous and free, and that has proven to be my experience



-- Edited by LinBaba on Tuesday 30th of November 2010 01:25:48 PM

__________________

 

it's not the change that's painful, it's the resistance to change that is painful



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 490
Date:
Permalink  
 

LinBaba wrote:

Interesting this seems to be a recurring theme

People who say the steps ARE the Program = miserable self-loathing grumps

telling a newcomer that the 12 steps ARE the program = ass kicking

That going to a big book or step study and concentrating on The Solution = being told to shut up

Well there is certainly a recurring theme of you putting words in my mouth and connecting dots, as well as assuming you are the target of my response... LOL.

As to sponsoring people, that's an attraction-over-promotion thing.  I've never tried to convince anyone, overtly, directly, or indirectly, that I should be their sponsor.  I guess I am not perceived as someone with leadership or authority qualities, and I'm ok with that.  My original sponsor did come across as an authority, which is kind of interesting because hanging out with him never turned me into one.

I guess I should mention, even though it's not necessary, that for every self-loathing grump that I've met in AA, I've met 20 more who worked the steps and came across as happy, joyous and free.  The self-loathing grumps were more into putting people down and themselves down by inference, than working the steps.  In fact my own old-timer, traditionalist, authoritarian, slightly grumpy but not glum sponsor told me in the middle of my self-flagellation that I called my first attempt at a 4th step, to write down 10 good things about myself.  I hemmed and hawed and really couldn't think of anything and even when I tried to write something out - however qualified it may have been, this voice in my head was screaming "Liar! Liar!!"  That was something I came to very, very slowly.

I don't find grumpiness in the steps.  It's certainly possible to work the steps only from a negative side - and that's how to get mired in 4, 5, 8, 9 and never get around to 6 or 7.   When I came to AA, self-loathing was ME, it was my middle name and probably my first name and last name.  I was *attracted* to fellow self-loathing grumps, but fortunately that was short-lived.  There were people doing a whole lot better that attracted me and I got swept up in wanting what they had. 

I guess I still have way more ego than I can cope with, I'm still drawn into these threads even when I try to just live and let live.  Nothing I say is going to change anyone's opinion, and certainly isn't going to change their experience.  I'm going to try and just listen for a while.

Barisax



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 49
Date:
Permalink  
 

this thread is absolutely awesome .Let me tell u ibeleive in hardcore aa for the last 21yrs ive gone soft and no growth i thank god for yhe sponsor in my life today.here is an example .....Hi sponsor dont know how to let go ....answer......You dont know how take out your big book rEAD IN IT YOU WILL GET YOUR ANSWERS AND STOP WHINNING BOUT THINGS . Shocking  not so just the way its done and works for me . Maybe harsh for some but i am at a crossroads in my life and i decided to do whatever it takes no more half measures . so it is  AA works if i work it. thanks for this eye opening forum.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 362
Date:
Permalink  
 

I wonder how much of a factor the continued use of the word "God" (rather than "Higher Power") is?

When I attended a day treatment program, I met a lot of women who were experiencing their first exposure to AA meetings. Many of them were turned off and gravitated towards alternate programs like Lifering because of the frequent mentions of God in AA. I discussed this with them an tried to explain that I'm also not religious but that "God" just means a Higher Power, mine is sometimes the strength of the AA community, sometimes the power of time, it doesn't have to be a religious god. Still, I think replacing "god" with "higher power" in the literature might make the program more palatable to a wider audience.

That said, we have something like 700 meetings a week here in San Francisco so I think AA seems pretty alive and healthy!

GG

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 268
Date:
Permalink  
 

I am slowly creeping sideways away from TwelveSteps while whistling softly and looking skyward and trying to look lightening-bolt proof.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 268
Date:
Permalink  
 

Looks like the idea of God was never popular; that may be the point:



"I was in favor of practically everything he had to say except one thing," Wilson later recalled of his conversations with Thatcher. "I was not in favor of God."
After a couple of days at Towns Hospital, Bill Wilson was past the d.t.'s and feeling really low. Science could do nothing for him. He now realized that he couldn't kick the booze by himself. Yet he was unable to believe in the only power experts knew of to save a drunk.

Then:




"Like a child crying out in the dark, I said, 'If there is a Father, if there is a God, will he show himself?' And the place lit up in a great glare, a wondrous white light. Then I began to have images, in the mind's eyes, so to speak, and one came in which I seemed to see myself standing on a mountain and a great clean wind was blowing, and this blowing at first went around and then it seemed to go through me. And then the ecstasy redoubled and I found myself exclaiming, 'I am a free man! So this is the God of the preachers!' And little by little the ecstasy subsided and I found myself in a new world of consciousness."

Wilson never had another drink.



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 490
Date:
Permalink  
 

Rainspa wrote:

"Like a child crying out in the dark, I said, 'If there is a Father, if there is a God, will he show himself?' And the place lit up in a great glare, a wondrous white light. Then I began to have images, in the mind's eyes, so to speak, and one came in which I seemed to see myself standing on a mountain and a great clean wind was blowing, and this blowing at first went around and then it seemed to go through me. And then the ecstasy redoubled and I found myself exclaiming, 'I am a free man! So this is the God of the preachers!' And little by little the ecstasy subsided and I found myself in a new world of consciousness."

Wilson never had another drink.



I never had an experience anything close to Bill's, and I think that's true for most of us.  Even so, I thought that if I didn't have the bright light/mountaintop spiritual experience, I must not be doing it right.  I had to come to accept that God is going to reveal what He chooses to me in His own time, in His own way.  There was nothing sudden about my spiritual experience.  But if I compare my outlook on life now, to 20 years ago, it's obvious that a change has taken place. 

It may just be a matter of need.  I didn't drink myself to death's door, I didn't cry out in final desperation.  I didn't have the bolt-upright spiritual awakening.  It took me a while.  Imperceptibly long while.  Some people might think that makes me not a real alcoholic, or not really recovered.  I'm not concerned with what they think.  I'm certain my life has gotten better in every way in sobriety, and I'm equally certain that had I kept on drinking, I would have drank myself to death's door or right on through it.  Whether that aspect is part of my past, or just on my "yet" list should I drink again, does not change what I need to do to stay sober today.  Nor does this week's scientific research, nor the opinions of others, AA or not, change what I need to do to stay sober today.  I didn't have a spiritual experience, then get sober.  I got sober, and discovered sobriety IS a spiritual experience.

Barisax



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 362
Date:
Permalink  
 

Rainspa, I think that's kind of my point. In the big book the message is that if you are an atheist/agnostic, you just haven't had your magical conversion experience YET. A lot of people find that patronizing. Many people have thought it through over a lifetime and do not believe in the sort of god described in the big book. But the world is still full of many powers greater than ourselves from which we can draw strengh. I think the key part is turning your will and your life over to fate or some other higher power and recognizing that we as humans cannot control the outcome, so we need to stop trying -- to whom or what we are turning it over is of less importance. I just think it would be helpful if that was more clear to the newcomer.

Personally, I would love to believe in a god, I think it would be so comforting to think there is someone up there watching over me and designing a path for my life. But you can't just make yourself believe something you know in your heart isn't true, and that shouldn't stop anyone from working the steps in their own way and getting sober through AA.

GG

__________________


MIP Old Timer

Status: Offline
Posts: 805
Date:
Permalink  
 

My "God" doesn't have a peepee nor is anthropomorphic in any way shape or form

Bill offers us "Why Don't you choose your own concept of God" and then proceeds to describe his concept, it needn't be my concept, nor anyone else's concept, he uses Christian Language because that is the language he knows, I have a "Higher Power" I call "God" just because it is simpler that way, but my "God" is not related to the Christian "Gawd" in any way shape or form, as a matter of fact, I am a heathen, Pagan, Atheist, Agnostic

Yet I have a "God as I understand God", and everywhere I see the word "God" I put my own concept of the word God, I don't believe in heaven, or hell or angels or any religion

yet none of this is meaningful in the slightest, it is a non issue

because I have a "God as I understand God" and it's no one's business but my own what that concept is, just as anyone else's concept of God is none of my business, I go to meetings and talk about God all night with Buddhists, Wiccans, Right wing Christians, Atheists, and Agnostics, and we are all in perfect agreement, perfect harmony, because we all realize when we each say the word God, we are each free to put our own "value" in that word

So when Bill talks about "The Father of Light" The Wiccan could be seeing Gandalf, The Buddhist, a fat bald guy, The Christian, Gandalf without the Hat, and I am seeing the great void, the Universe, The Galaxies, The past and The Future, and we are all cool

Because the Big Book is VERY explicit

WHy Don't you choose your OWN concept of God?

The only people I have ever seen stumble on that are people who get stuck looking at others peoples concept of God and can't get it together to have their own concept

-- Edited by LinBaba on Thursday 2nd of December 2010 08:54:53 PM

__________________

 

it's not the change that's painful, it's the resistance to change that is painful



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 403
Date:
Permalink  
 

Twelvesteps, regarding it being comforting to think there is someone up there watching over one and designing a path for one's life, it can actually be pretty terrifying because the plan He is hatching may be neither comfortable nor easy. Martyrdom is one possibility some have faced!

It's not so much comfort as groundedness. If one recognizes order in the universe then a lot of things make a lot more sense than they would otherwise.

-- Edited by zzworldontheweb on Thursday 2nd of December 2010 11:03:38 PM

__________________
Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's, and unto God that which is God's.


MIP Old Timer

Status: Offline
Posts: 805
Date:
Permalink  
 

zzworldontheweb wrote:

Twelvesteps, regarding it being comforting to think there is someone up there watching over one and designing a path for one's life, it can actually be pretty terrifying because the plan He is hatching may be neither comfortable nor easy. Martyrdom is one possibility some have faced!

It's not so much comfort as groundedness. If one recognizes order in the universe then a lot of things make a lot more sense than they would otherwise.

-- Edited by zzworldontheweb on Thursday 2nd of December 2010 11:03:38 PM




See that's just it

12steps is entitled to her own concept of a power greater then herself, it's hers and hers alone, and no one else's business, not even to editorialize about

That is one of the few things that actually is utterly sacred in AA, the freedom to have our own concept of our own higher power, and one of the few "taboos" is pushing our higher power on others, it's REALLY poor form, and not allowed in meetings

The book is about making contact with a higher power, not concerned with telling others what their concept should be, and having a spiritual awakening of the educational variety as the result of the steps using whatever higher power we choose

a few comments in this thread illustrate her point for her about why some are uncomfortable with what could be perceived as religion in the program, rightfully so, some of us are pretty touchy about religion when we get here, which is why we stay out of religion and politics in AA, there is no place for them here

If no one tells us aboot their God's wee willy, we promise not to point and laugh in other words



 





-- Edited by LinBaba on Friday 3rd of December 2010 12:33:09 AM

__________________

 

it's not the change that's painful, it's the resistance to change that is painful



MIP Old Timer

Status: Offline
Posts: 755
Date:
Permalink  
 

coffeemachine.gif  coffeecup.gif 

LinBaba sez "The only people I have ever seen stumble on that (choosing one's own concept of God) are people who get stuck looking at others peoples concept of God and can't get it together to have their own concept."

 

I was thinking about this subject back in February, so some of my post is from an older post, but it still represents where I am at with my own concepts surrounding this "God thing", which at base is what AA is all about...no way around that, it is an historical fact...the central thesis of God as the Power greater than ourselves may be morphing into something else these days, but, if, so, then too is AA, which comes full circle back to the first post on this thread.

 

Since I am Not God...whatever the heck I understand, or dont understand that to be, or not to be...it means there is hope for me, because I do not have to go it alone...and that is what AA is all about.

 

My shortcomings are merely human...there is no human behavior, however horrifying and despicable, that only one person possesses. We are all in this together. If there is the capacity to be honest, then there is hope. If there is hope, then there is the potential for humbleness. 

 

I have learned in my sobriety that if I can humble myself enough to allow some genuine  humility emerge from within and be evidenced externally, I will live and grow in sobriety and receive...and be able and willing to share...all the good things that brings. If not, then I am sorely limited and may perish, in the soul-death of alcoholism, dry or drunk.

 

It concerns me that there is such an aversion, distortion,  dilution, substitution thing going on in AA culture today that seems bent on chipping away at the (undeniably Christian) roots and essence that birthed and has carried this fellowship for pushing 100 years now. Just as we tend to attribute anthropomorphic qualities to God (and capitalize His name) we speak of AA as though it is a single living entity. AA can not sustain itself. We have to do it.



-- Edited by leeu on Friday 3rd of December 2010 08:16:18 PM

__________________
Willingness is the key.


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 403
Date:
Permalink  
 

Hmmm... I can see how my comment above could be considered "crosstalk", yes. That could be another word for editorializing.

My aim was more to suggest that Twelvesteps not feel bad or left out because she's perceives herself to be missing out on any specific type of feeling.

__________________
Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's, and unto God that which is God's.


MIP Old Timer

Status: Offline
Posts: 805
Date:
Permalink  
 

leeu wrote:

coffeemachine.gifcoffeecup.gif

LinBaba sez "The only people I have ever seen stumble on that (choosing one's own concept of God) are people who get stuck looking at others peoples concept of God and can't get it together to have their own concept."

I was thinking about this subject back in February, so some of my post is from an older post, but it still represents where I am at with my own concepts surrounding this "God thing", which at base is what AA is all about...no way around that, it is an historical fact...the central thesis of God as the Power greater than ourselves may be morphing into something else these days, but, if, so, then too is AA, which comes full circle back to the first post on this thread.

Since I am Not God...whatever the heck I understand, or dont understand that to be, or not to be...it means there is hope for me, because I do not have to go it alone...and that is what AA is all about.

My shortcomings are merely human...there is no human behavior, however horrifying and despicable, that only one person possesses. We are all in this together. If there is the capacity to be honest, then there is hope. If there is hope, then there is the potential for humbleness.

I have learned in my sobriety that if I can humble myself enough to allow some genuine humility emerge from within and be evidenced externally, I will live and grow in sobriety and receive...and be able and willing to share...all the good things that brings. If not, then I am sorely limited and may perish, in the soul-death of alcoholism, dry or drunk.

It concerns me that there is such an aversion, distortion,  dilution, substitution thing going on in AA culture today that seems bent on chipping away at the (undeniably Christian) roots and essence that birthed and has carried this fellowship for pushing 100 years now. Just as we tend to attribute anthropomorphic qualities to God (and capitalize His name) we speak of AA as though it is a single living entity. AA can not sustain itself. We have to do it.



-- Edited by leeu on Friday 3rd of December 2010 08:16:18 PM

 




I don't think "choosing your own concept of God" is diluting the program though, I got sober on the "left coast", in San Francisco and The Bay Area, where there is a LOT of Eastern Religion, Atheism, and Agnostics, the where I know hundreds, if not thousands of people who's concept of God doesn't include the Christian Deity, and they are Big Book fundamentalists, as am I

This Program is meant to be a spiritual one, not religious, and as Bill states, the realm of the spirit is all inclusive, never exclusive, one doesn't need to be a follower of The Christ to find the realm of the spirit, but many of us had Christianity shoved down our throats as children and adults, just like Bill when he describes his experiences in WE Agnostics, so many newcomers are touchy about what could be construed as the Religious aspect of The Program, until they learn it is a spiritual program, not a religious program, and there is complete and utter freedom of religion and beliefs in AA. AA, like the realm of the spirit, is inclusive to all alcoholics, not just the Christian ones.

All we need is the willingness to believe in a Power greater then ourselves, it needn't be a Christian Power

To help other alcoholics achieve sobriety, Bill W. borrowed and embraced many of the Oxford Group's principles, of which there were four requiring members to:

  • Make restitution to any people they'd harmed;
  • Take a moral inventory by listing "personal defects;"
  • Confess these defects to another person; and
  • Receive direction from God through prayer and meditation.
After parting ways because Bill W. thought the Oxford Group was becoming too political and too black-and-white (and other reasons, both sides were pretty tired of each other, but one reason was to allow Catholics in AA LB), he wanted a program of tolerance and not specific requirements. It was then that he talked about a "higher power" as the source of conversion experience. This could be a Christian God or any other power greater than him- or herself that an alcoholic would accept.

A.A. members can believe in anything they wish, including the Christian religion, but everyone, no matter WHAT their religios beliefs are, are entitled to full membership in the A.A. fellowship including atheists, agnostics, Jews, Moslems, Buddhists, Hindus, and many others who are recovering alcoholics.

The A.A. Preamble
The A.A. Preamble states: A.A. is not allied with any sect, denomination, politics, organization or institution. This is clear enough. If A.A. is not allied with any sect, denomination ... or institution, then it is not allied with the Christian religion, which is, after all, one particular sect. There do exist other religions and other beliefs, and it is my experience that The Program of AA is big enough for all of them, which is why we have no opinion of outside religion...there is no need for it, nor a place for it in AA.

You an Alcoholic that worships a flying female spaghetti monster?

Welcome, you are in the right place

The Third Tradition
The Third Tradition says: The only requirement for A.A. membership is a desire to stop drinking.  It does not say, the only requirement is to believe in a Christian Deity


 



__________________

 

it's not the change that's painful, it's the resistance to change that is painful



MIP Old Timer

Status: Offline
Posts: 755
Date:
Permalink  
 

I hope I am not being misunderstood---I actually agree with everything you (LinBaba) are saying!!

Perhaps of interest to some, is the discussion in New Jersey around late '38 that led  to the insertion  of the stunningly powerful words and concept "...as we understood Him..." into the Third Step. For a nice tidbit on the history, pp.166-167 of Alcoholics Comes of Age describes the process they went through.  

As an atheist looking for any excuse to reject the 3rd Step, I for one am very thankful for the discernment that AA absolutely is a spiritual program, and absolutely not a religious one. (Doesn't negate the theological roots, tho). Without the opening of that door, I might have walked away.

__________________
Willingness is the key.


MIP Old Timer

Status: Offline
Posts: 805
Date:
Permalink  
 

leeu wrote:

I hope I am not being misunderstood---I actually agree with everything you (LinBaba) are saying!!

Perhaps of interest to some, is the discussion in New Jersey around late '38 that led  to the insertion  of the stunningly powerful words and concept "...as we understood Him..." into the Third Step. For a nice tidbit on the history, pp.166-167 of Alcoholics Comes of Age describes the process they went through.  

As an atheist looking for any excuse to reject the 3rd Step, I for one am very thankful for the discernment that AA absolutely is a spiritual program, and absolutely not a religious one. (Doesn't negate the theological roots, tho). Without the opening of that door, I might have walked away.




We are absolutely on the same page...it's funny, "in" AA I can talk about spirituality to anyone regardless of their beliefs, whether they believe in "The Father" or even "The Mother" Goddess, or in the great void (Buddhism) it just doesn't matter, we are on the same page

I was on a atheist/Agnostic forum in recovery for awhile (it was a subset on a site that had many views, including AA and Alanon) and I have never met a group of people with such closed minds, it was embarrassing, at the first sign of any sort of spirituality these people would lose their F'ing minds and start on these rants against Christianity, I mean their minds would literally snap shut, and I would try to explain, hey whoa whoa, I am NOT talking about "Gaaawd" I am only talking about some basic spiritual principals, I mean you weren't even allowed to -say- the G word and they would STILL lose their minds

They were unable to choose the idea of their own concept of a higher power or ANY spiritual principal, they attended things like "Rational Recovery" and they spouted about "Reason" but the thing is they were neither reasonable nor rational, any spiritual concept at all and all they could think of was someone else's concept of God that they had been beaten with as Children

They would rant and rave about how Christians were intolerant, close minded and ignorant, when the truth was it was them that were displaying these qualities, it was so very sad, and it made me embarrassed to be Atheist/Agnostic

They were literally unable to "think outside the box" to have a concept comfortable to them, or even be open to any sort od spiritual concepts at all, and sadly enough, hardly any of them could get or stay sober, and I have truly never come across a more unhappy and maladjusted group of people

I would like to say that this is absolutely not my experience in "real life" but it just struck me, as I was originally like "Oh Look, my people" have their own area...only to discover that nothing could be further from the truth, it's been years now and I am STILL watching some of these members struggle with trying to get sober, and it is all because of their issues with the word "God", it is so incredibly sad

 



__________________

 

it's not the change that's painful, it's the resistance to change that is painful

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.